I rely on ‘Israeli News Live’ for ‘what’s happening behind the scenes’ regarding Israel and the extremist elements within the Jewish faith. 

It makes sense to listen to a reformed Zionist, now converted to Christianity, because he knows the Talmud, he knows the mind set, the foundation upon which peoples and nations are forced to move. 

It doesn’t matter whether or not I believe what they believe, it’s sufficient to know that Zionists and those who follow the Talmud – the body of ‘knowledge’ against which Christ railed as ‘making naught of God’s word’ - act upon their beliefs  and are no different in intent to Islamic State and are just as evil. 

Why mention this when the world reels from virus and cascading effects. 

Agendas continue. 

Noahide Laws. I enclose George Bush’s words, written in 1991, in which a lie and an utter nonsense is put forth as if it were true. 

Very strange aspect of history it is that ‘ancient’ conjures up the time of Christ or not much earlier when, in truth, it’s a tiny fraction of mankind’s existence and God, whatever God may be, did not leave those prior humans without access to spiritual life. 

No venerable Jewish scribe, no matter how long his beard, compares with an Aboriginal spiritual life tens of thousands of years more ancient, more real than the ‘laws’ being foisted upon the world by these scribes. Yet the scribes have the power to now have all 50 states in the U.S.A. add this nonsense into their school curriculum. 

                              Public Law 102-14, H.J. Res 104 


102nd Congress of the United States of America 

March 5, 1991 

Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded; 

Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws; 

Whereas without these ethical values and principles the edifice of civilization stands in serious peril of returning to chaos; 

Whereas society is profoundly concerned with the recent weakening of these principles that has resulted in crises that beleaguer and threaten the fabric of civilized society; 

Whereas the justified preoccupation with these crises must not let the citizens of this Nation lose sight of their responsibility to transmit these historical ethical values from our distinguished past to the generations of the future; 

Whereas the Lubavitch movement has fostered and promoted these ethical values and principles throughout the world; 

Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the Lubavitch movement, is universally respected and revered and his eighty-ninth birthday falls on March 26, 1991; 

Whereas in tribute to this great spiritual leader, “the Rebbe,” this, his ninetieth year will be seen as one of “education and giving,” the year in which we turn to education and charity to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws; and 

Whereas this will be reflected in an international scroll of honor signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That March 26, 1991, the start of the ninetieth year of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of the worldwide Lubavitch movement, is designated as Education Day U.S.A The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities. 

Approved March 20, 1991. 

Signed by George Bush, 


And so it goes, the relentless hunger for power and control by those least able to use it for the benefit of all. 

Meanwhile, the weather here has been beautiful, cool, Autumn, misty, days perfect for renewed growth after a blistering Bushfire season. A season which has left many with trauma enough without adding a virus. 

How life changes, everyday social activity slows or almost ceases and playing music with my nephews – a rare event - gets postponed. 

But life goes on, I still take my walks and enjoyed five days of sun last week during which I took the whipper snipper to our local park and did some guerrilla gardening. Can’t get any more socially isolated than a man with a whipper snipper. 

Meanwhile signs go up saying ‘Cash not accepted’ – perfect time to introduce a cashless society worldwide while fear of germs takes hold. 

Hard to know how the next few months will unfold. Perhaps 5G roll outs will proceed at pace because demand will increase and voices of caution over the health aspects of 5G will just not be heard. 

Populations may be confined but agendas continue. Origin Energy here in Australia are proceeding with fracking regardless of tribal outcry echoed by many in the wider population. 

That’s the point, umpteen agendas continue while we’re distracted. 

It gives me time to get more familiar with this host server and how to use the site template. 

I’ve made the songs here free just because I can. You’re welcome to pay for them but it’s not necessary. 

Keep well.

meanwhile 5G continues to roll out 

Inquiry into 5G in Australia: Misinformation by whom? 

Posted on March 9, 2020 by Stop Smart Meters Australia 

Australia’s parliamentary inquiry into 5G, which was announced in September 2019 with submissions due at the beginning of November 2019, continues to trundle on. 

Over 500 of the responses have now been published on the parliamentary website.  An overwhelming majority of these have raised concerns about the deployment of 5G technology. 

The parliamentary committee charged with undertaking this inquiry held public hearings in Queensland and the ACT last year, followed by hearings in Perth, Adelaide, Melbourne and Sydney in February.  According to Parliament’s webpage on public hearings, witnesses are called to a hearing so that the committee “can hear from people who have experience or expertise that is relevant to the committee’s inquiry”. 

Given that the lion’s share of submissions highlighted evidence of potential harm as a result of the rollout of 5G, and the authors of the submissions included a number of highly credentialled members of the public, why has the committee chosen to instead hear, in the main, from 5G proponents? 

Analysis of time allocated at hearings shows that telecommunications companies and other supporters of 5G have been granted a staggering 91% of timeslots.  To add insult to injury, witnesses who have refused to jump on the 5G bandwagon were shunted into giving evidence at public hearings located in cities other than their own, even when there was a nearby hearing scheduled.  This is grossly unfair – obviously being able to present in person beats having to participate by teleconference. 

Although the volume of submissions meant that some submitters waited a number of months for their submissions to be published on the parliamentary website, to the committee’s credit, it is also evident that late responses were accepted.  Steve Weller, author of submission 530, and current executive team member of the Oceania Radiofrequency Scientific Advisory Association, used this opportunity to rebut pro-industry spin contained in earlier responses. 

Preposterous claims, such as that made in Vodafone Hutchison’s submission, which states that “Australia has some of the most comprehensive and stringent radio frequency safety and electromagnetic energy (EME) compliance requirements in the developed world” are called out in an appendix to the submission. 

Surely the millions being spent by the government to build public confidence in the safety of telecommunications and 5G, and to address ‘misinformation’ about electromagnetic emissions, would be better spent confronting the reality that wireless technologies are harmful to health? 

The engineers responsible for a paper entitled “Electromagnetic Radiation due to Cellular, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth technologies: How safe are we?”, which has been accepted for publication in a future issue of IEEE Access, a scientific journal published by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, contend that “Both individuals and governments must be aware of the fact that the current population has already been exposed to dangerous levels of radiation and the resulting adverse health effects may surface in people at any time”.  The point is made that “Without thorough research and well-designed safety measures in place, wide-spread deployment of 5G networks could prove to be dangerous” (SSMA emphasis). 

Scientists have been sounding urgent warnings regarding ubiquitous and increasing exposure to electromagnetic fields for decades.  Medical practitioners are coming face to face with the consequences.  Engineers are now recognising that wireless technologies must be avoided as much as possible and urging us to instead favour “new and innovative wired solutions which provide the same level of user-friendliness”. 

In light of this groundswell of awareness, how much longer can the Australian Government continue to aid and abet wireless industry interests? 


outright hostility ensues regarding the truth surrounding 9/11 

9/11 Truth and the Silence of the IR Discipline 

Hughes, David (2020) 9/11 Truth and the Silence of the IR Discipline. Alternatives . pp. 1-28. ISSN 0304-3754 

Full content URL: 

This is the latest version of this item. 


9/11 Truth and the Silence of the IR Discipline 
Author's Accepted Manuscript 


IR scholars uncritically accept the official narrative regarding the events of 9/11 and refuse to examine the massive body of evidence generated by the 9/11 truth movement. Nevertheless, as calls for a new inquiry into the events of 9/11 continue to mount, with the International 9/11 Consensus Panel and WTC7 Evaluation inquiries having recently published their findings, and with a US Federal Grand Jury on 9/11 having been announced, now would be an opportune moment for IR scholars to start taking the claims of 9/11 truth seriously. A survey of the 9/11 truth literature reveals that the official 9/11 narrative cannot be supported at multiple levels. Two planes did not bring down three towers in New York. There is no hard evidence that Muslims were responsible for 9/11 other than in a patsy capacity. Various US government agencies appear to have had foreknowledge of the events and to have covered up evidence. Important questions regarding the hijacked planes need answering, as do questions about the complicity of the mainstream media in 9/11. IR scholars avoid looking at evidence regarding the events of 9/11 for several reasons. They may be taken in by the weaponized term, “conspiracy theory.” A taboo on questioning the ruling structures of society means that individuals do not wish to fall outside the spectrum of acceptable opinion. Entertaining the possibility that 9/11 was a false flag requires Westerners to reject fundamental assumptions that they have been socialized to accept since birth. The “War on Terror” has created a neo-McCarthyite environment in which freedom to speak out has been stifled. Yet, if IR scholars are serious about truth, the first place they need to start is 9/11 truth. 



I'd be happy to be wrong 

Issues that I’d prefer to be wrong about: 

No culture of secrecy about paedophiles in our religious institutions. 
No cause for concern about illegal activities within the banking system. 
No issues of abuse and neglect within our Aged Care and Disabilities sector. 

These are all areas for which we’ve had Royal Commissions in Australia. They’ve found these institutions either corrupt or ‘ethically challenged.’ 

Recommendations get made and life goes on as if it’s all better now or soon will be. 

Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. This isn’t ‘news’ to anyone so why would I expect that this isn’t the case in the corridors of power. 

There are more ‘think tanks’ than you can ‘poke a stick at’ yet the world is an utter mess and shows no sign of improvement so either the think tanks are useless or there’s an agenda at work which relies on this ongoing and worsening mess in order to bring in the ‘new world order’ that so many political figures mention as if it’s both a good thing and needed. 

Events don’t tend to happen on the world stage by accident. The waves of refugees fleeing destroyed societies throughout the Middle East are a direct result of policies put in place by the same people that brought us the Project for a New American Century. 

Never heard of it? It stated that to maintain America’s pre-eminent position, after the fall of the Soviet Union, that regime change was needed in a list of countries in the Middle East which have since been destroyed by America and its ‘coalition of the willing.’ 

War dogs. Men and women of evil intent. 

People aren’t willing to go to war. A cause is needed and 9/11 provided it. 

The University of Alaska, Fairbanks have completed a four year study into Building 7 and concluded that office fires could not have caused the collapse of this 47 story skyscraper situated next to the Twin Towers. 

It will not make the news. The implications are horrendous but  will it  make the news?



First day of Autumn here in Australia - cool and beautiful with rain expected.

A good day to open a channel of communication via a blog. It also makes my previous posts open for comment which is unintentional on my part and just an outcome of changing the settings here.

rejecting ideological positions 

It’s clear that there isn’t any real debate when it comes to climate change so rather than trade looks of incomprehesion or question sincerity why not look to something which should be beyond dispute or ideology. 

Coal, solar, wind, hydrogen, fracking, hydro/electric – what percentage of our daily needs come via these utilities. I don’t know and very few people would have these figures at their fingertips. 

Put it up on a chalk board for all to see and get agreement from political parties that these figures are fairly accurate. Put it up on billboards, advertise the figures without comment, let it sink in, provoke thought and then bring the political parties to a National Conference where the plans to replace one fuel with another can be scrutinised and, if found wanting, discarded. 

Forget ideological stances. If your plan reduces us to shivering in the dark while we fight over a turnip, you won’t convince me of its merits. 

When ‘natural gas’ came through our suburbs I was happy to sign up and pay a premium for ‘clean green energy.’ I was much dismayed later to find that there’s nothing clean or green about using chemically laden ‘waste water’ to extract gas by smashing the very ground we stand on and by provoking the real risk of contaminating our aquifers with no way back and no apology sufficient. 

A quick flight over the West Coast of America via google Earth will show masses of white dots which resolve into fracking pads. There aren’t a few, there aren’t tens of thousands, there are hundreds of thousands stretching from county to county and State to State - from the mountains to the sea. You could start looking around the L.A. area and – there they are, even in the middle of orchards, and once fracking gets a foothold it will not stop. A junkie with a needle in the arm is an exact parallel. 

Greed knows no bounds. I’m not in favour of fracking. I did think, perhaps wistfully, that there exist big bubbles of ‘natural gas’ beneath the ocean just waiting to be tapped. I have no idea if this is the case and it’s not helpful to knee jerk react with – they’re all fossil fuels and must be ‘got rid of.’ 

To be replaced by what? 

 Thoughts in motion with a constructive idea thrown in.