david griffith - saucepanbach

Consensus in science doesn’t exist and I’m not sure that it could given the nature of scientific inquiry. 

Yet when it comes to Climate Change the absurd 90% plus figure regarding consensus is trotted out like a Gospel.

31,000 American scientists disagree about consensus so that's worth the pause for thought.

The text of the Global Warming Petition Project reads, in its entirety:

"We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind. 

There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth."

‘Artorius Rex Discovered’ is not a book for the faint hearted. It is so densely packed with minute detail that it’s no wonder that a search for ‘Wilson and Blackett debunked’ turns up no result. A bit of scurrilous nonsense but nothing real. 

To debunk such scholarly research would require a physical retracing of their steps, an excellent fluency with the Welsh language, a deep understanding of history and sources, context within that history and a keen intellect not encumbered by bias or self interest. A decade or so of time may also be required. As there is in existence a whole industry in England dedicated to making money from Arthurian legend then courage and perseverance will also be needed. 

There are no takers for such an endeavor. Wilson and Blackett are ignored. Understandable in England but a disgrace within Wales where the ‘powers that be’ have a duty to prove them wrong or otherwise. 

I had no interest in King Arthur – surely myth and legend or so I once thought - and found Wilson and Blackett while researching my own voyage back to Wales – land of my birth, land of my fathers. I wanted a deeper map of time and place than that generally available. 

It was by their lectures and their collaboration with Adrian Gilbert who wrote ‘The Holy Kingdom’ that I found the roadmap I was seeking. It served me well and I’m grateful to the authors. 

It was four years ago when I made that journey but only very recently did I find the book ‘Artorius Rex Discovered.’ I’m very glad that I did.

and Jordan Peterson

‘Twice as fast’ … what could this relate to except ‘Global warming.’ 

Tony Heller is indefatigable when it comes to detail about climate. He’ll scour newspaper reports and, unless those reports were false, then the temperature graphs used to promote the CO2 aspect of climate are false. 

Who would believe this unless they checked. 

I did and started with the Sydney Observatory and their records. It was only in 1714 that Fahrenheit invented the first modern thermometer. It, no doubt, took awhile before it was in standard use so those records don’t go far back in time. 

Michael Mann, the fraudster behind the infamous ‘hockey stick’ graph, sued after being called a fraud and lost his case, in British Columbia, with costs awarded to Dr Tim Ball. 

That the climate is changing isn’t in dispute so silly phrases such as ‘Climate Denier’ are a deflection. The IPCC continue to create reports which – believe it or not – take no account of the sun’s activity. 

It’s the sun cycles which change the climate and I’ll continue to breathe CO2 onto my plants which they drink and, in turn, give me back oxygen. 

The problem with climate science is actually lack of consensus as any real reading of this subject will reveal. 

Meanwhile the sun continues its cycles and we can expect a continuation of Earth’s often catastrophic history. This is yet another uncomfortable aspect of life which doesn’t sit well with the long, quiet evolution which most of us were taught regarding the past. 

‘What does it matter that a lie was promoted if we now have greater impetus regarding renewable energy?’ 

It absolutely matters. The logical end result of the CO2 lie is that the world would be better off if we all stopped breathing. 

Our local pub reopened a few weeks ago with the Wednesday night ‘plug and play’ back in operation. 

I took a break and went to the beer garden and joined the table of a bloke with a splendid beard. 

We exchange pleasantries – as you do. 

‘Ah well’ say I, ‘We can’t even talk about the weather without running into conflict.’ 

A nice enough bloke, intelligent and used to be a journalist. He accepts the prevailing narrative of CO2 being the cause of climate change so that subject died. 

We move to 9/11 where he finds no problem with buildings falling down into their own footprint and suggests that the twin towers were glass buildings and that a plane flying in would be sufficient to cause the damage. I appreciate that he wasn’t suggesting that glass was the only substance holding the buildings up but he seemed unaware that these towers were steel clad and were designed to withstand an aircraft impact. 

The point being that he hadn’t checked anything in relation to 9/11 but did recognise that if aircraft were not the cause of collapse then the implication is of controlled demolition which requires time and therefore ‘bearded terrorists’ would not be the only suspects. 

Those weren’t his exact words which were closer to “Inside job?” 

So … in quick succession we moved to UFO’s and the bias inherent in many academics who are fixated on the idea that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light and, thus, UFO’s are unlikely. That appeared to be his position. 

My contention is that alien activity is and probably always has been here whether we choose to believe or not. 

Belief is irrelevant, knowledge trumps belief and the fact that I can’t produce a physical alien artefact or give ‘rhyme and reason’ to alien existence is of no importance. Our military know better as do the millions who have witnessed and know what they saw.

I’m not looking for argument nor to convert so it was time to move back to the music after my bearded mate wondered whether I thought that the moon landing was faked or that the Earth was flat. 

‘No’ to both, just for the record. 

This is the sad thing about a cheerful and friendly contact in which questions are raised. Perhaps I’m wrong in my impression but because I raised ANY questions about events and situations which affect us all, we move from climate to where I’m asked if I believe that the Earth is flat. 

In other words … I must be a ‘Conspiracy theorist.’ 

Ah … the good old days when men were men and conspiracies weren’t ‘just theories.’

“Twice as fast?” … no … let’s take it slowly. Do the research.

It was a brief conversation, years ago, brief because I had no answer. 

9/11 related. 

“Do you know that over two thousand architects and engineers have a signed a petition calling for a re-investigation into 9/11?” 

Quick as a flash … “What about the thousands who haven’t signed.” 

Years pass. 

There are now over 3500 architects and engineers who have put their reputations on the line and signed the petition. 

Many more thousands, like myself, have signed the public petition. 

Their latest newsletter: 

AE911Truth celebrates the milestone — and verification — of 3,500 architects and engineers 

Xander Arena, AE911Truth verification team leader 

October 7, 2021

The achievement heralded in the headline of this article was accomplished, coincidentally, on the 20th anniversary of that fateful day the world calls “9/11.” Such an important milestone is worthy of a closer look. 

Let’s think about what it means to be a verified signatory to the petition of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth — to stand on the front lines of such a monumental mission. 

The more than 3,500 architects and engineers who have signed AE911Truth’s petition exhibit the highest order of honor and courage. They have placed allegiance to their professional disciplines above personal gain. In a society whose leadership still seeks to marginalize and slander them, casting them aside as pariahs, they have made the choice to stand proudly for what they know to be right. They have shown the utmost integrity and commitment to their oath to protect the public welfare. They are not just professionals; they are truly champions. 

Each architect and engineer who signs our petition must prove their credentials in order to be validated and displayed on our petition as an “AE.” We require each professional signatory to have a four-year degree or higher in their engineering or architectural discipline — or substantially equivalent professional licensing. 

At AE911Truth, it is our duty to rigorously verify our petition signers. Over the years, an additional 2,000 people beyond the actual 3,500 AEs tried to sign our petition, claiming to be architects or engineers. Most of them probably are, but for one reason or another they either did not complete our verification process or did not fully meet the requirements. Or perhaps they didn’t receive our requests for further information. Whatever the case, the 3,500 verified mark we reached last month reflects a figure and process that 9/11 Truth activists the world over can count on. 

As an aside, it’s no secret that algorithms can be devised to throttle the spread of information, channel communications to spam folders, or even now relegate phone calls to “suspicious caller” categories. So, if you’re an engineer or architect who signed our petition, whether ten days ago or ten years ago, please visit https://www.ae911truth.org/signatures/#/AE and ensure that you are properly displayed. If you are not, then kindly follow through and contact AE911Truth to complete the process. Your signature and support matter! 

Xander Arena verifies AE911Truth petition signers with the help of his conure, Aurora. 

Verifying our thousands of supporters is a labor-intensive task, performed by generous and service-oriented volunteers who make great sacrifices to help “Team Truth.” And though our loved ones likely lament the lost time — the hours we put into verifying AEs instead of hanging out with family and friends — the intrinsic reward of helping to amplify the call for a new 9/11 investigation is a satisfaction that is without equal. As a volunteer verifier, I consider it a great honor every time I send the following message to our confirmed AE signatories: 

“We thank you so much for your courage and support. You are indeed on the right side of history!” 

Once one understands the importance of what AE911Truth does, it is hard to sit on the sidelines. Signing our petition is itself an act of service — one I, too, chose to make some time ago. As a member of our “general public” category, I am proud to find my name amongst physicists and physicians, mathematicians and musicians, pilots and flight attendants, social workers and construction workers, psychologists, attorneys, veterans, firefighters, nurses, law enforcement professionals, homemakers, school teachers, restaurant owners, grocery clerks, and tens of thousands of other admirable thinkers and doers. 

Our “general public” category, replete with concerned and capable citizens who have taken the brave stand of speaking out and being heard, now has more than 30,000 signatories. Many of them hold jobs that are termed “professional.” I point this out to emphasize that codes of conduct and ethical standards exist not only in the building profession — compelling engineers and architects to take a stand for truth — but also in all professional disciplines, demanding that their constituents not be silent in the face of criminality. 

If you peruse the AE and the general public categories, you will see that some signatories make interesting statements expressing their ethical concerns, explaining their expertise, and offering their support, while many others simply add their name to the ranks. Both actions are equally important. 

Undoubtedly, many people fear the implications of publicly expressing a desire for “a truly independent investigation with subpoena power, which seeks inquiry into the possible use of explosives that might have caused the destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7.” Yet the very pillars of truth we stand upon protect our signatories. Indeed, those who fairly and thoroughly examine AE911Truth’s evidence and claims come away understanding that we are on the right side of the argument. The light of 9/11 Truth eviscerates even the darkest of shadows. 

Acknowledging we have not yet received an honest and impartial investigation into the worst crime in American history, whose consequences have harmed the entire world, is a psychological turning point in many peoples’ lives. Grappling with a betrayal of that magnitude may even be scary, but to not speak out only perpetuates additional abuses. Individuals and societies have been able to overcome harrowing histories of violence and walk forward into the future. Such fortitude creates strength, trust, and respect. 

The world deserves the truth. We deserve governance by truthful leaders and institutions. We deserve an open and honest accounting of what transpired before our very eyes and cost us all so dearly. 

If you have not yet signed the petition calling for a real investigation, or if you are an architect or engineer who has not completed the verification process, I urge you to please do so expeditiously. Our collective future depends on it.